Login/Register

Votermedia Shareowner Proposal Campaign

The goals and rationale for these proposals are explained in the article Proxy Voting Brand Competition.

Date Submitted Target Company Ticker Proposal Management Arguments; Proponent Responses; SEC Decision AGM date; Proxy link; Result
2013-12-15 CAT SEC correspondence archive 2014-06-11
Omitted
2013-05-18 CSCO AGM info & proxy; FT Agenda article; CorpGov.net post; SEC correspondence archive. 2013-11-19
1.3% yes
2012-11-29 AMZN SEC correspondence archive 2013-05-24
Omitted
2012-08-07 COST SEC correspondence archive 2013-01-24
Omitted
2006-05-26 MSFT Management did not try to omit. Board arguments in proxy; proponent response. 2006-11-14
2.0% yes
2004-11-26 INFO Board & proponent arguments similar to those in Oregon Steel 2004. 2005-06-16
11.4% yes
2003-12-11 CPN SEC correspondence archive. Board arguments in proxy; proponent response. 2004-05-26
9.0% yes
2003-11-26 USG SEC correspondence archive 2012-12-29
Omitted
2003-11-26 VC SEC correspondence archive. Board arguments in proxy; proponent response. 2004-05-12
7.1% yes
2003-11-24 HRP SEC correspondence archive 2012-12-29
Omitted
2003-11-18 OS 2004-02-27 Revised proposal. Board arguments in proxy; proponent response. 2004-04-29
20.0% yes
2003-10-20 USU SEC correspondence archive. Board arguments in proxy; proponent response. 2004-04-29
8.0% yes
2002-11-22 VC 2003-03-07 SEC 2003-05-14
Omitted
2002-11-17 USG SEC correspondence archive 2003-04-28
Omitted
2002-11-15 CLF 2003-03-04 SEC 2003-05-03
Omitted
2002-05-15 SHLM Board arguments in proxy; proponent response 2002-12-05
2.9% yes
2002-05-15 USU Excluded from proxy because of wording of broker letter: SEC correspondence archive. 2002-11-06
Omitted
2002-01-25 FLE SEC correspondence archive 2002-09-10
Omitted
2000-11-24 SBLU 2001-01-25 Management; 2001-02-07 Proponent; 2001-03-23 SEC
Omitted
2000-11-16 EQS 2001-03-11 Revised proposal 2001-05-03
17.8% yes
2000-11-06 G 2001-02-15 Revised proposal; Board arguments in proxy; proponent response 2001-04-19
2.4% yes
2000-10-23 KBH Board arguments in proxy; proponent response 2001-04-05
4.0% yes
2000-03-31 OTFC
Omitted
2000-02-17 CRUS
Omitted
1999-12-22 GM
Omitted
1999-11-20 EQS
Omitted
1999-11-17 WM 1999-12-15 Management; 2000-01-10 Proponent; 2000-01-10 Revised proposal; 2000-02-22 SEC 2000-04-18
4.4% yes
1999-11-13 BMY
Omitted
1999-11-04 PFE 1999-12-21 Management; 2000-01-10 Proponent; 2000-01-10 revised proposal; 2000-02-22 SEC
Omitted
1999-11-02 C 1999-12-22 Management; 2000-01-10 Proponent; 2000-01-10 Revised proposal; 2000-01-24 Management; 2000-01-31 Proponent; 2000-02-22 Management; 2000-02-24 SEC
Omitted
1999-11-02 GE
Omitted
1999-11-02 G
Omitted
1999-11-02 WLA
Omitted
1999-10-11 WFMI Management did not try to omit. 2000-02-05 Revised proposal 2000-03-27
8.9% yes

Only a representative sample of management arguments, proponent responses and SEC decisions are linked above. The full public record of this correspondence can be found (for a fee) at SECnet.

Proposals that made it into the proxy can also be found in the "DEF 14-a" filings at www.sec.gov, with Board arguments.